All too often in our work we find organisations referring to “hazards” and “risks interchangeably. Understanding the distinct difference between these two concepts is not just a matter of semantics. Let’s demystify these terms with examples to illustrate their unique roles in maintaining a safe work environment.
A hazard is anything that has the potential to cause harm. This could be a substance, process, practice, or situation. Hazards are inherent properties or conditions; they have the potential for harm but do not guarantee it. The identification and elimination of hazards forms the basis of effective risk management.
Risk, on the other hand, is about the probability (likelihood) that a person will be harmed by the hazard and the severity (impact) of the harm. Risk therefore is a function of hazard exposure and consequence, providing a measure of the extent to which someone might be affected.
Let’s take a shark as an example. A shark swimming in the ocean is a hazard but the risk of harm only appears if we jump in for a swim near that shark. Likewise, while lightning itself is a hazard, the risk of harm increases if we go and stand out in a field during an electrical storm.
Physical hazards and their associated risks tend to have linear relationships. Meanwhile, when it comes to psychosocial hazards, relationships between cause and effect, including those of likelihood and severity of impact, are somewhat more complicated and multifactorial. When assessing the risk associated with a psychosocial hazard, we need to keep a few things in mind:
For these reasons, it’s important for organisations to fully understand their psychosocial landscape and implement control measures that address multiple psychosocial hazards at once and that are less reliant on opt-in individual level interventions.